Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Encouraging Recreational Soccer Match Parity

The league where we play recreational soccer doesn't keep standings until U9. At that point, official scores and standings are maintained by the league. Parity is highly encouraged by our league. One way they do this that the official goal differential for any match is limited to 3 goals. In other words, the winning team will never have more than a 3 goal lead for any game in the official standings.

Now your place in the standings does matter because it is the top 3 teams in the bracket who receive trophies. Often one of these positions will come down to a tie breaker. Head-to-Head is the first tie-breaker which is clearly good, but after that are goal-differential and goals-allowed.

Goal-differential is actually good because it is independent of the number of goals the opposing team scored so long as the difference is 3 or more. In other words, the better team if they are several goals up, can play in such a way that the other team may score some goals and still not make the goal differential less than 3.

Goals allowed, on the other hand, discourages the better team from allowing the other team to score any goals at all. A shutout is the best possible outcome from a tie-breaker standpoint. To top it off, if the goals allowed are equal, they actually use the number of shutouts as the next criteria.

Standings based on points (3 for win, etc), then head-to-head, then goal differential are excellent tie breakers, but in just the two and a half years I've coached since the girls turned U9, I've seen trophies come down to the goals-allowed tie breaker. It does happen, particularly in a 3-way tie. And having goals-allowed as a tie breaker will influence how "generous" a coach will be in those mismatches that will occur during the season.

Recreational league tie-breakers should not include goals-allowed or shutouts. Instead, base the final standings on fewest cautions during the season or a playoff shootout or something like that. Make it based on good sportsmanship or at least something fun rather than how well you kept the weaker teams out of the goal.

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Playing to Win or Do We? (cont)

I was looking for studies / surveys of why kids play soccer to support / disprove my argument that we over-emphasize winning while coaching our kids. I found a good BBC blog article that supports that we are overemphasizing winning at a young age and it's killing England's ability to compete at the international level. (Fun is the Key to England's Football Future)

I have to believe we parents and coaches are overemphasizing winning. I'm including me. For example, we played a game this last season against a team that had the worst record in the bracket. I pulled the girls that usually score; I hate "punishing" them for being good players, but it gives the other girls a chance to step up; its good for the team. Still the game was one-sided. I put some girls up front that rarely score and moved the forwards to the back. Still the game was one-sided.

At this point I'm concerned about what I did (or didn't do). I think I should have pulled one of my girls and gone a player down. I rationalized not doing that by telling myself I was giving our less-inclined-to-score-players a great chance to learn a different aspect of the game. While this was true, the players at the back and the keeper were not challenged at all. Here is the point, where if I'd kept in mind that players enjoy the challenge (in the end) more than the victory, I would have done things differently.

The game is about entertainment. The game is about memories. If we'd gone a player or two down and the other team had scored some goals, would I have regretted it? Or would the great plays we would have made while playing short-sided been far better memories? (I'm not even considering the impact on the other team, but I have to assume they would have liked getting the ball out of their end even if they had a number advantage.)

I'm going to go with the opportunity to make great memories in the future.

Monday, December 20, 2010

Playing to Win or Do We?

We play to win. We try our hardest because we want to win. We practice, sweat, freeze, and sacrifice because we want to win. The coach feels the urge to win in his players and himself and does everything in his power to win. It so easy to forget, soccer isn't a job. Soccer may help prepare us for a job, it may help us do our job better, but soccer is not a job (at least for most of us). It is so easy to forget that you can win a championship, but if it wasn't fun, you're not coming back.

The studies show that winning isn't what keeps most players playing soccer. It's the challenge, the team atmosphere, the fun. Now if I could just find a reference to those studies...I'll have to look for them later.

Update: I found this article on the US Youth Soccer website with several references at the bottom. Youth Soccer in America - How do we measure success? There's a quote midway through the article that I thought summed up my thoughts well:
"Winning isn't everything, but trying to is!" – Rainer Martens, sports psychologist

Friday, December 17, 2010

First Things First - What to Coach First for Soccer

I have it from a reliable source (footy4kids) that a good set of skills for youth soccer players to develop first are the ball-holding skills.

In the spring, I'm going to emphasize these holding skills even more. I'm also going to emphasize the skill of waiting for the defender to take a stab at the ball and beating them with a quick touch.

We've done some work where the kids dribble toward a goal and a defender and try to beat that defender, but it has occurred to me that it might be good to learn to beat the back by standing still and reacting to the defender's first move. By removing the act of dribbling, it takes a lot of the timing and touch skills out of the equation and may make it easier for the kids to learn how to hold the ball while facing their opponent. Of course, they'll eventually need to learn to attack on the move, but I'm thinking practicing this "stand and wait" method may be a good incremental step.

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Who Gets the Credit for the Goal?

I watch Barcelona whenever I can. It's a joy to watch them play soccer. One of their young forwards, Pedro, is a player I tell my kids to keep their eye on. Sure he scores plenty of goals, but I tell them to really keep their eye out for 2 things:
  1. Watch how he hustles. His energy when he's pressuring the ball and off the ball movement when he's not are a great example to any kid.
  2. Watch what he does when he scores. The first thing Pedro does after a goal is sprint to the player that passed him the ball and "give" that player the credit for the goal.
When my kids score, that's what they need to do; look for the teammate that helped make it happen and give them a big hug or high-five. I think Pedro's attitude is contagious within his team. I even saw David Villa run to Pedro after after scoring a goal assisted by a nice pass in from Pedro. It's moments like these that really make me smile.

Monday, November 22, 2010

Adding the overlapping run to our tactics

The girls did good the season. They've come a long way in the last 2 years when we basically started with half a new team.

(Before going into what we'll do next, let me apologize for not updating this blog much the last few months. It was one of those times when somethings had to drop off the list and sadly this was one of them. I'm getting back into the grove and I hope I can remember some of the things I wanted to say during the season.)

The girls' skills have certainly improved, but there is plenty of room for more improvement; however, if they're not kicking the ball around outside of practice, that improvement will come slowly. I don't complain. The fact is, even my own daughter doesn't even look at a soccer ball in the off season. I'm assuming we're all in the same boat, so let's move on.

Tactically, our back line (2 outside backs and a center sweeper) played fantastic. Pressure, cover, balance. I don't recall ever noting in a game this season that we were leaving a player unmarked in front of our goal. This was our biggest problem in previous seasons and it just went away. Was it coaching? Maturity and experience? I'll never know. Either way, it's time to challenge them again.

The big change I want to add next season is the overlapping run from the outside back. It will require not only coaching her to make the run and the forward to feed the ball into the space in front of her before she's offsides, it will require the other players to rotate around to cover for the vacancy created in the back. This will be interesting. If anyone has advice on this I'm all ears.

-Bill

Thursday, October 14, 2010

A new soccer game that is a hit with the kids

I've got a new soccer game the kids (U7 boys) love to play. We make a square. For my seven boys, a 10 x 10 yard square seems good. All but one player have their ball. The one that does not have a ball is the target. All the other players are trying to hit this target (below the waist) with their ball. Whoever hits the target becomes the new target and the old target gets their ball and joins the others.

The game moves quickly. The kids have a blast. They learn to move in fairly tight spaces with the ball close to their feet for a quick shot. When they shoot and miss, they run after their ball and dribble it back into the square for another try. Every player has a ball but one, so we're getting lots of touches. Best of all, a good time is had by all.